Popular Comments

dave
Discussion: The Rose Garden and White House happenings: Listening to voters’ concerns

The fact that many now turn to Facebook and other social media for their news is part of the problem.  The erosion of the Fourth Estate proves its importance in keeping a democracy running.  

Like  4 Likes
marksierra
Discussion: Inconsequential Chat

Came upon these just recently:

Songs of disappearance - Australian Bird Calls.

In this ARIA chart-topping recording of pure birdsong you can hear 53 of our most threatened species:

(ARIA is the Australian Recording Industry Association.  Aussie version of the Grammy Awards.)

https://youtu.be/c2M0H9Z1HuQ


Aussie Birds and their calls

https://youtu.be/vhlE13EqjJk


Australia's most common birds

https://youtu.be/T5UEwzp2bWs

Like  3 Likes
mrincredible
Discussion: Now a general weather chat thread

max_weisenfeld said:

Less humid now and tomorrow and a nice breeze

I’ll buy that for a dollar!

Like  3 Likes
DaveSchmidt
Discussion: T**** is your 2024 Republican candidate - OWN IT!

Smedley said:

I'll rephrase and try again. If the problem on May 23, 2024 is a deluded electorate, how and why was the electorate apparently non-deluded in 2020-21, and what was the inflection point?

Racking my brain for inflection points in 2020. All I can come up with are a pandemic and the murder of a Black man by a white Minneapolis police officer.

Like  3 Likes
max_weisenfeld
Discussion: Now a general weather chat thread

Less humid now and tomorrow and a nice breeze

Like  3 Likes
PVW
Discussion: What does Putin want (and whatabout it)

Let me see if I can sum up the Nan doctrine:

- If any former SSR shows signs of U.S. meddling, this represents and existential threat to Russia, and there are no limits on how Russia can respond. Anything -- invasion, occupation, annexation, threatening nuclear strikes -- is justified in response to an existential threat.

-  Any former SSR that acts against Russian interests is acting on behalf of the U.S. No post-Soviet state would ever, of its own volition, act against Russian interests. Any state that does so,and any political leader in such a state that does so, is an agent of or being manipulated by the United States.

- No act by a former SSR to provide for its own defense against current or future Russian aggression is justified, because if Russia is threatening it this means Russia is responding to U.S. meddling. In fact, the very act of taking defensive measures is itself proof of ill intent against Russia, directed by the United States.

Like  2 Likes
dave
Discussion: The Rose Garden and White House happenings: Listening to voters’ concerns

nohero said:

DaveSchmidt said:

joanne said:

I’m not sure what our marsupials have to do with your political/judicial system?
wink

It’s a recycled cartoon from the 1950s, when everyone thought Menzies had the American vice president in his pocket.

Let's not jump to conclusions. 

oomph

Like  2 Likes
KarenMarlowe
Discussion: The NYT Spelling Bee Thread

Shockingly, I got QB today after a wild stab at a long word. I was sure it would be wrong, but it was I who was wrong.  :bz

Like  2 Likes
jimmurphy
Discussion: The NYT Spelling Bee Thread

Me three yesterday.  Finding today difficult.

Like  2 Likes

Sponsored Business

Find Business

Featured Events

Advertise here!